SUBJECT: Assignment #1, Response Paper #2
AUTHOR: Leanne C. Boyd
Course: MCTE 625 - Survey of Courseware,
Assignment #1, Response Paper #2
Textbook: Computers in the classroom:
Mindtools for critical thinking
Jonassen, D. (1996)
Chapter 2: Using mindtools to develop critical thinking
and foster collaboration in schools
Professor: Dr. George Fornshell
Student: Leanne C. Boyd
Usercode: boydl
Due date: October 5, 1997
Response to Chapter 2, Using Mindtools to Develop
Critical Thinking and Foster Collaboration in Schools
One very clear dichotomy has appeared in my line of
thinking because of the current readings. In Chapter 2 of
Jonassen's book, I began to realize that topics concerning
critical, complex and creative thinking, and especially
collaboration in the construction of knowledge, also have
everything to do with the PATHWAY of academic and
professional effort that I have pursued for over a decade.
In this chapter, the dividing line between traditional
and current models of critical thinking boil down to
one fine point, at least as they apply to my life. The use
of the word "mindtools" denotes the use of all available
learning tools in the PROCESS of learning, where there is
no "end" to the process. The success one finds is indeed
the flourishing of new thoughts and achievements in
the JOURNEY of education. So often in related readings,
definitions for these new modes of learning have included
phrases such as "lifelong learning." LEARNING, in current
modes of thought, has finally come into its own right as an
evolutionary journey rather than an end or pre-defined
finality.
For many years, I have seen my own career as a
pathway, rather than as isolated steps leading to one
final, definitive and conclusive goal. In the highly
competitive world of traditional (mostly) Western thought,
where each person is expected to "pull himself up by his
own bootstraps," perhaps the idea of collaborative learning
and the evolution of collective success by a team over a
period of time, is very alien to most people. The era of
new technology and new media has ushered in not just the
mindtools to facilitate improved critical thinking, but
it has provided the doors for massive creative thinking.
As we all learn together how to go beyond accepted
knowledge to generating new knowledge, we all will embark
on this PATHWAY. It is to be expected, I think, that there
is a great deal of trepidation and even fear, as the
education system undergoes such mighty changes.
The designation of "mindtool" is perhaps a new term.
The concept of mindtools, I believe, has been with us for
perhaps as long as humankind has functioned as a
communicative village. From the onset, humanity's success
in NOT becoming extinct has been based in the very real
concept that our "social construction" included the cunning
to collaboratively learn how to survive. Stephen
Littlejohn quotes philosopher Alfred Schutz in describing
the idea of the social construction of reality:
"The world of my daily life is by no means my private
world but is from the outset an intersubjective one,
shared with my fellow men, experienced and interpreted
by others: in brief, it is a world common to all of
us. The unique biographical situation in which I find
myself within the world at any moment of my existence
is only to a very small extent of my own making."
(Littlejohn, 179.) (Schutz' ideas were given in his
book, On Phenomenology and Social Relations, 1970.)
In exploring education and the process of learning, it
is really very essential to recognize that each of us is a
part of a larger whole. As we go from previous modes of
thought, I find it exciting that "learning to learn" within
a collaborative environment is the essence of our new media
and technology. My own recent academic experience in a
Bachelor's program with a major of Technical Communication
and an emphasis in new media included most courses being
taught within this framework of collaborative learning. I
feel very fortunate to be in this forerunning group.
There are excellent examples happening all over the
world that attest to the success of the pathway/journey
form of learning. For instance, the leaders at the
University of Nebraska have begun to explore complex areas
of education and to reach beyond traditional methods of
education. Part of this is realizing that today's "school"
must adopt today's advanced technologies and innovative
teaching methods in order to provide students with the
skills they need to run the educational institutions of
tomorrow. (Lotus Academic Solutions, 1997.) I would quickly
add...or even the institutions of today!
One type of software recognized as a powerful possible
mindtool is a spreadsheet/database software. At the
University of Nebraska at Lincoln, the use of (in
particular, Lotus Notes) spreadsheet/database software has
provided an excellent foundation for creating their virtual
university. It has helped them create a truly innovative
learning environment for "collaborative, active learning on
a multi-pathway system -- including course syllabus, group
projects, library databases, discussion databases for class
meetings." (Lotus Academic Solutions, 1997.) The class
modules created using the software allow for smooth class
organization and interactions, even though class
members never meet in one formal gathering place. The
collaborative learning model literally stretches all over
the world. The model for Nebraska's online university
appears similar to Nova's structure, in which the elements
provide a tremendous possibility for communication and
learning as a group.
A nice benefit of this virtual environment has been
a superior degree of interchange between students or
student-to-teacher. Most traditional classes might generate
20 or 30 interactions during any given class meeting.
Nebraska has experienced with Notes-based learning that
more than 100 interactions take place within one class
meeting. (Lotus Academic Solutions, 1997.) Whether the
foundation of the system is set up in Lotus Notes or
another appropriate mindtool, the same efficiency factors
of the model most probably will remain similar. I think it
is important to note that the same software being utilized
as the initiator of the learning process by the educators,
is also cited as an excellent mindtool for use by the
student.
The University of Nebraska is excited about their new
program, and rightly so. In heralding the ground level
shift from "...teaching to facilitating learning...Notes
enables a new approach to education, one that empowers
learners by providing them with a range of new tools and
the ability to develop their critical thinking and problem-
solving abilities. To succeed, all formal and informal
educational institutions must recognize this change in
approach and adjust their strategies accordingly." (Lotus
Academic Solutions, 1997.)
When thinking about creativity in learning, what
standards can we begin to use to compare the traditional
versus the more current modes of introducing "creative
thinking?" I believe we can start by comparing the use of
computers for their established uses for several decades as
drill-and-practice machines, to their burgeoning use as
highly effective learning devices. In our readings, I have
noted that the authors rather dispel the notion that
graphics or paint software might be used as a mindtool. My
own experience, both as an audio-visual specialist in
Denver's largest high school, and also in my academic
training on the university level, nudges me to take issue
with that concept. It is my belief that graphic, paint, and
similar authoring software (such as Macromedia Director or
Asymetrix ToolBook) are MIGHTY mindtools, on a par with
database, spreadsheet, word processing or other
productivity software.
The National Academy of Sciences' online book source
has this to say about potential mindtools: "With
imaginative, inspiring software, students are not forced to
come up with the one right answer; rather, they learn to
ask many questions and to devise multiple approaches to a
problem. They learn at their own pace and in their own
style, so that skilled students advance without restraint
while other students have the various resources they need
to meet high standards." (NAS, A new model for education,
1995.) Again we find that in talking about creativity in
learning and the effectiveness of collaboration, we also
inevitably are talking about an ongoing process or pathway
throughout the student's life. Traditional schools have
always accentuated individual attainments and the
competition factor. They have discouraged students from
working or even talking together. All of us probably well-
remember the absolute quiet of the tightly controlled, no-
talking-allowed classroom! In this new environment,
experiences of the student and the teacher as co-learner
and mentor emphasize critical thinking, teamwork, and
connection. These are the skills being widely implemented
both in the academic world, and certainly in the modern
work world where the largest new commodity is...
INFORMATION.
I see a very important benefit being offered because
of new learning methods. As the classroom envelops ever-
widening areas of the world, with classmates coming from
opposite sides of this planet, one would think that the
isolation factor would be predominant. Oddly enough, this
is not showing to be true. Many of the "new schools" show
that "...in small groups, individual students act as peer-
tutors for others. Because they are often the ones most
familiar with new technologies, students lead by example,
helping their classmates work through problems. In this
way, students begin learning from an early age how to
communicate and how to assume greater responsibility for
their own education." (NAS, A new model for education,
1995.)
Another excellent example of how this new mode of
learning is taking place across our country and the world
is the growing computerized learning facilities in the
state of North Carolina. Students are being linked to such
programs as the National Geographic Kids Network and the
Jason Project. Within these programs, students are able to
compare their own studies and data against the findings of
students worldwide. "Through the Jason Project,
oceanographer Robert Ballard is interacting with hundreds
of thousands of students in real time...in such places as
the Mediterranean Sea or mid-ocean ridges. During the Gulf
War, students in the United States communicated regularly
over the Internet with students in Israel, discussing such
subjects as what it feels like to be under attack by Scud
missiles." (NAS, Networking K-12 education, 1995.) I join
the excited thousands in viewing the tremendous learning
opportunities in these programs. It is surely evident that
this is the first generation to have the limitless and
boundless resources available and to be able to participate
in a "classroom" that includes hundreds or thousands of
participants.
The mindtools available to the distance learner are
the height of creative thinking methods and means. Never in
our history have we had so much available. "Distance
learning multiplies the resources available to schools and
teachers, greatly increasing opportunities for both
teaching and learning. It invites students anywhere in the
country to acquire the information they want directly from
experts. Network links expand and enrich the pool of
teachers in mathematics, science, or other fields.
Moreover, the information students receive via networks can
be individualized to fit their specific needs." (NAS,
Networking K-12 education, 1995.)
What does this mean for learners, worldwide? What this
means for ME, is that by encompassing the total square
acreage of the planet, we actually DECREASE the isolation
factor that has been a brick wall for education and learning
in many secluded areas. Rick Boucher, U.S. Representative,
stated that our new networking technologies provide
potential access to learning resources that just haven't
been available in rural school systems or in financially
disadvantaged inner-city schools. (NAS, Networking K-12
education, 1995.) The act of collaboration is absolutely
necessary in our new model of learning. Actually, educators
are learning alongside the ones being educated. That, in
itself, is a primary and most important step in learning
collaboration!
Therefore, we are looking at a more cooperative
approach to learning because the computer gives us a very
discovery-oriented learning mode, and then it makes
possible a vast universe of methods for discussion,
mediation, and critical thinking. "Students can work in
groups to solve problems and use the computer to compare
their efforts with digitally stored information and with
similar efforts outside their school... The Internet is a
key element in reinventing K-12 education. Children and
adults alike who have access find that the Internet's
boundless information resources and communications
capabilities are not only enlightening but fun." (NAS,
Networking K-12 education, 1995.)
On a more local level here in Colorado, some advanced
thinking concerning creative and collaborative learning
methods are going on in one of the state's historically most
isolated, under-privileged spots. The San Luis Valley,
located high in the southern Rockies, has been, by lay of
the land, truly isolated for hundreds of years. Even with
modern transportation and roadways, this high plain area has
been cut off for great portions of the year by weather and
difficult accessibility. Descendents of Spanish Land Grants,
the local people have characteristically been of Hispanic
origin, culturally and financially impoverished by
historical data and happenings. The human spirit is,
however, invincible. Given just an inkling of the
possibility for a means of salvation -- a new tool -- the
human is highly inclined to make the best creative use of
it! Recently, a few "activists" (read that, computer
enthusiasts) have been hard at work in the poorest areas of
the San Luis Valley. They are trying to use this technology
to attack the extensive problems of access (or lack thereof)
to learning resources. In my opinion, there is not a better
example of the Internet as a mindtool than in this instance
of the San Luis Valley! This rural area shows us what
happens when the concept of creative thinking and
collaborative learning is grasped on a whole-scale basis:
"The students and a continuous flow of other people started
reaching out of the valley online and started getting the
idea that they could...get educated..." (Rheingold, 1996.)
As we embrace the concept that learning is a life-long
PATHWAY, an extraordinary journey, a passageway for one's
self and for one's progeny, it feels exceedingly good to
read about the insistence of the human spirit in taking on
the task of learning improved ways. A fine example is found
at the Sierra Grande High School in Fort Garland, Colorado,
where "students have set up a computer assembly business,
putting together '386' computers and selling them
inexpensively to the community. Our problem is that we don't
have enough machines to give lessons to all the people who
want to learn." (Rheingold, 1996.)
It seems an appropriate ending to this writing to
observe that in at least this case, and probably in
hundreds of others, students and educators alike are using
the tools of the new technology to solve not only problems
in the education system, but also the financial overview of
their immediate locale. It is a marvelous thing that use of
these mindtools encompasses what appears to be every aspect
of daily life, from the education we seek to the coins it
takes to buy our daily bread.
---
References
Littlejohn, Stephen W. (1996). Theories of human
communication. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Lotus Academic Solutions/Lotus Development Corporation
(website modified: October 1, 1997). Solutions for distance
learning: Collaborative learning takes hold at the
University of Nebraska. [On-line]. Available:
http://www.lotus.com/school/215a.htm.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and National
Academy of Engineering (1995). Reinventing schools: The
technology is now. [On-line]. Available:
http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/techgap/index.html.
NAS: A new model for education. [On-line].
Available: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/
techgap/newmodel.html.
NAS: Networking K-12 education. [On-line].
Available: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/
techgap/K-12net.html.
Rheingold, Howard (1996). Brainstorms: San Luis
Valley: Can the Internet help improve rural economies?
[On-line]. Available:
http://www.well.com/user/hlr/tomorrow/sanluis.html.
If you have comments or suggestions, email me at Leanne@refuge-earth.org
All works on this site are protected, copyright ©1984 - 1999